Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.U.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to PU. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 19:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.U.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This definition, etymology, and list of uses in popular culture was sent to Wiktionary in 2008. Similar content is now at wikt:P U. PROD was refused in 2008 because the article "seems to be slighly more than a dictionary def now". That slight addition, the list of cartoons or movies that use the expression, has since grown slightly, but none of the uses is sourced, nor do they seem notable. Cnilep (talk) 01:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 01:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to PU which is a disambig page with this meaning as one of the entries. There is no reason to think this is the most common meaning for the two letters. Kitfoxxe (talk) 03:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to PU. Very little here is sourced - all that is is a dictionary definition. --Michig (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.