Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.H.T.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was sof delete. J04n(talk page) 16:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
P.H.T.[edit]
- P.H.T. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like bogus Uberaccount (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: "Putting Husband Through" or "Putting Honey Through" (college) does appear to be a frequently used, albeit purely honorary term. I think it's likely notable. Praemonitus (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This does seem to exist, as a 1950's accomplishment: [1][2][3][4]. Might not be as relevant now to women but may have been discussed at some stage during gender studies. Funny Pika! 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hard to say. I thought this was a less frequent variant of the Mrs. degree, but that was merged into Mrs. in a deletion debate way back in 2006. But now, Mrs. doesn't mention the phenomenon at all. Perhaps it's worth recreating that article and merging this one there? --BDD (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've only ever heard of this as "Putting Him Through". Nyttend (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article has been an orphan for three years, which means that nothing will ever link to it, and it is not encyclopedic. A weak case can be made to trans-wikify to Wiktionary. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.