Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford University Cave Club (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A merge would be too messy, and nobody has really provided evidence of notability. If someone wants to create a "List of Oxford clubs" article or some such, they can message me for the article text.--Wafulz 03:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oxford University Cave Club[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Oxford University Cave Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Renomination after the previous AFD was closed as keep. However, I don't see that it meets the standards of WP:ORG. There was nothing in the AFD that indicated individual notability of this club, and there are still no references. FrozenPurpleCube 19:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the University of Oxford's review for 2001-2 says that "The Oxford University Cave Club is one of the leading speleology clubs in the country". I couldn't confirm that elsewhere, but didn't look very hard. I did find this - a history of a century of British caving. What might be more interesting is to have an article about the British Speleological Association. I wonder if I can start a trend of getting AfD vote deleters to give examples of what would warrant an article, instead of just voting delete? Carcharoth 21:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, what the University of Oxford says about its own clubs is hardly a third-party source, so I don't think that gets past the notability concern. And I suppose there could be a national organization that merits its own article, but this isn't the place to decide that. BTW, AFD=!votes. FrozenPurpleCube 22:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, but I prefer to discuss until I've made up my mind. Sometimes I never do make up my mind. Carcharoth 22:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, what the University of Oxford says about its own clubs is hardly a third-party source, so I don't think that gets past the notability concern. And I suppose there could be a national organization that merits its own article, but this isn't the place to decide that. BTW, AFD=!votes. FrozenPurpleCube 22:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to University of Oxford#Clubs and societies, in abridged form. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford University Asia-Pacific Society. --B. Wolterding 07:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced and failing WP:V unless the new page University of Oxford Clubs is created by the end of the AfD. A merge to the main article looks messy and a merge to a non-existent page would be tricky :-) The material can be added to a user sandbox and merged later if required. Bridgeplayer 18:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.