Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Summer Courses

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Summer Courses[edit]

Oxford Summer Courses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominated this for speedy deletion because the content is purely promotional and written by someone who admittedly is affiliated with the organization. The speedy deletion tag was removed by a new editor. Even if the article is cleaned up this is not a notable organization. It fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 02:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 02:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 02:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no WP reason for this school to have an article, so I am assuming WP:PROMO as the primary motivation. Note that in the talk page other such schools are listed as being comparable and having WP articles -- I think those are good suggestions for further AfDs. LaMona (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:27, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.