Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Review of Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Review of Books[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This magazine appears to be of recent vintage (2017) and a student production at Oxford University. Nothing wrong with that, but Sufficient Independent Coverage Required nonetheless, and that is lacking. Almost all provided sources are either in-house or listings. The one semi-substantial other bit is this, which frankly strikes me as an arranged puff piece. (I'd also like to add that this 'About' page makes me want to erect a barricade and start throwing bricks...) I've had no look finding anything online to fill the coverage gap; suggest insufficient notability for an article at this point. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Based on a quick online research, it does not seem to be sufficiently notable. It might become in the future though. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I haven't been able to find coverage beyond the single (probably) reliable source identified by the nominator. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete probably TOOSOON, but right now the sourcing is embarassing: blogs, facebook, self-published. ——Serial 16:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.