Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Westerhout

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Westerhout[edit]

Owen Westerhout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some very local articles about this athlete, with a best ranking of place 1332 (!) worldwide on the 400m. According to one of the articles, he nearly made the final of the Dutch indoor championships, and that's it. Miles away from actually meeting WP:NATH. Fram (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:NATHLETE and WP:GNG Spiderone 10:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, nowhere near an accomplished or even skilled athlete. Geschichte (talk) 10:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — doesn’t satisfy the appropriate SNG & doesn’t satisfy our general notability criteria for inclusion. Celestina007 (talk) 10:54, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not competing at elite level and does not pass GNG either. SFB 17:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability not established. He won gold at the NSK Indoor and NSK Teams, but NSK means Dutch Student Championship. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It mentions his personal best as a claim to notability?? If I don't get an article, neither does this guy. jp×g 12:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.