Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovidiu Sincai Social Democratic Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar · · 03:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ovidiu Sincai Social Democratic Institute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The main problem here is the lack of substantive coverage dealing with the institute itself. Here's what we have so far:

A couple of news briefs about opinions expressed by the institute or its legal status. Given that ziare.com is a news aggregator that publishes everything it can find dealing with Romania, these shouldn't even be taken into consideration. If reputable newspapers have written on the events described, we can consider quoting those.
A couple more pieces, this time from somewhat more reliable outlets, about reports/recommendations made by the institute, and a change of leadership.
Nine papers (five linked, four unlinked) published by the institute. Not independent sources, so these can be disregarded.
A short description hosted by an organization to which the institute belongs (so again, not independent).

In sum, we don't really have sources that talk about the institute per se, just a handful of news reports mentioning its select activities. That doesn't seem enough. I suppose we could mention it at Social Democratic Party (Romania), but a separate article doesn't seem warranted. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the requested updates. I am looking forward for the feedback and I want to know if the page is approved. ~~ MorganMorgan2011 ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by MorganMorgan2011 (talk • contribs) 09:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 01:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this article was considered for deletion because it didn't have concrete and objective sources. I have done the following things: - removed the ziare.com from references, I put instead valuable references (agerpres, other known and relevant newspaper) - put some more information about the institute - all the reports and papers have objective sources, not those from the Intitute itself - the lack of coverage was fixed, thus the article may be approved MorganMorgan2011 (talk) 05:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC) MorganMorgan2011[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.