Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overlord (Transformers)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Overlord (Transformers)[edit]
- Overlord (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This character does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Decepticons. Not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Decepticons. While there are a couple of third-party sources, there aren't enough to pass WP:GNG here; notable as part of the faction and worth a couple of lines, but not a full article unless additional sources are found. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per above - unable to find sufficient coverage for this character to warrant an independent article. Gong show 18:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.