Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outward Blonde

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no concensus = keep. — FireFox • T [11:02, 12 April 2006]

Outward Blonde[edit]

Tagged as PROD: "film has been in development for over two years. WP:NOT a crystal ball.", tag removed without explanation so it comes here instead. Sources, sources, sources. -Splashtalk 03:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep The sole reason is that I've seen a dozen other articles on upcoming movies. I'd kill them all, but eh... T K E 04:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete delete unless some significance can be brought to the article that can be cited ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 06:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMDB isn't enough for now? T K E 06:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Appears that the project is moribund. And with a plot of After failing gym, a snotty New Yorker is sent to an Outward Bound program let's hope so. Eusebeus 09:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep, seems notable enough with IMDB page, more or less confirmed. --Terence Ong 13:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep, stars Hilary Duff, so will definitely be notable when it comes up. --Rory096 14:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as crystal-ballness. Will obviously see recreation due to its star if it gets produced. Fagstein 18:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per rory and terence. just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it shouldnt have an article, tag should be replaced. --He:ah? 00:01, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If a movie has been filmed and is being edited, that's reasonable, but as a general principle, delete anything containing the words "filming will start". Too many projects fall apart before the cameras roll. Fan1967 01:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Filming hasn't even started. Let's wait until this pic is a sure thing at least before making an article. --DanielCD 01:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, and delete Outward Blond as well. This project has been in development since February 2004 (see [1]). IMDb is far from a reliable source of information on upcoming films, and WP:NOT a crystal ball. Also, the plot outline is a cut-'n'-paste copyvio from IMDb, though this is a secondary concern. Extraordinary Machine 17:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep --millosh (talk (sr:)) 10:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Luka Jačov 11:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Could the above two users please explain the rationale behind their votes? Films, even those with major stars attached, get cancelled all the time. Not even IMDb keeps the pages on them up once the editors (eventually) realise that they aren't going to be produced after all. Extraordinary Machine 22:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Extraordinary Machine. Sandstein 20:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Outward_Blonde&oldid=1138193042"