Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside Broadcast (U2 video)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fails music notability guidelines BigDom 20:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Outside Broadcast (U2 video)[edit]
- Outside Broadcast (U2 video) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability guidelines at WP:NM. Article is about a concert that was aired on TV, but not released on any video format. Many concerts are aired on TV and there is nothing particularly notable about this one. This concert could be briefly mentioned in Zoo TV: Live from Sydney (a concert video from the same tour) or Zoo TV Tour (the tour itself). –Dream out loud (talk) 06:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This actually asserts sufficient notability, but it lacks verification for any of its assertions. If the national/international broadcasts can be sourced, it should be kept. Jclemens (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I fail to see how a single broadcast of a random concert by a notable band grants notability to the concert. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 20:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's no need for this page, no one would ever want to read it, maybe except Bono himself, the guy just can't take the fact that his music career is in freefall.Wayne Paine (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why don't we just focus on this deletion nomination instead of making irrelevant side comments? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 20:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:IDONTLIKEIT if you plan to make useful contributions to deletion discussions in the future. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why don't we just focus on this deletion nomination instead of making irrelevant side comments? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 20:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Minor; per nom.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 07:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.