Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outdipper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, but with a merge tag added. I would have tried it myself, but despite reading both articles, I'm not familiar enough with cricket to figure out if there actually is anything not in outswinger. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 10:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Outdipper[edit]

Terminology not in use, topic covered under outswinger. As mentioned by some other users this term along with indipper is not used and is covered in the entry outswinger. -- The Cord 17:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Vote I don't think anyone unfamiliar with cricket is going to be able to help to resolve this issue. --Hyperbole 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with outswinger if possible. Otherwise delete. See [1] for some help. Slowmover 22:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete. — Mar. 30, '06 [07:16] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 19:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge anything important into outswinger --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 19:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to outswinger. Redirects are cheap. Merge anything useful with outswinger. Capitalistroadster 23:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.