Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our own school

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Our own school[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This school does not exist. The article describes a virtual school Jovianeye (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article provides no evidence of notability (indeed, article provides no evidence of passing WP:V), the usual searches suggest there exists a school of that name but nothing further. As the article as currently written is heavily promotional, I suggest we delete as being of no value to an encyclopedia. Ray^Talk 21:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and lock out: the name is too generic. Might be used in the future by others who create articles about their school. Alexius08 (talk) 03:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Found proof of existence, and yes, that's the name, so no need to lock it. Tagged for notability. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per would be A7 if any other organization. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized that the name 'Our Own School' is used by several schools. As you type 'Our Own School' into Google, the search engine itself suggests this title. Hence a lockout on this name should not be needed. Jovianeye (talk) 21:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate, delete, and then delete the disambiguation for lack of anything to link to. In other words, just delete. An alternative in this case might be the "incubator" (which appears to be new, but I haven't been here very frequently recently...). Per above the school appears to exist -- this is not a hoax article (or a "virtual school"). --Thin boy 00 @197, i.e. 03:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - The school clearly exists, in a brick-and-mortar sense. However there is no evidence of notability, and the article lacks what should be obviously necessary information in an article about a school (public or private? what ages or grades?). --MelanieN (talk) 04:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.