Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Power

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Our Power[edit]

Our Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM. While released by a notable label and featuring notable musicians, I can't find any evidence that the album itself is notable; it doesn't seem to get better than this passing mention. Lennart97 (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Although I'm the creator here, I did so at a very different time in wikihistory — once upon a time, the only notability claim a compilation album had to have was that it had notable artists on it, the end, and nothing else was necessary beyond that. That's no longer the case, however: an album now has to have much stronger evidence of notability, such as awards or chart performance or WP:GNG-worthy critical attention, and I can confirm that this one just doesn't clear the tighter standards that apply in 2021. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Above, Bearcat is an experienced article creator and is knowledgeable about music notability guidelines, so his analysis is convincing. I also can find no evidence that the album was noticed by reliable media sources, and it seems to have only been discussed insignificantly by the participants in the associated charity drive. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I found three mentions on ProQuest from 2006–07, but they're only 3 sentences each. The best of them is from Maclean's; Vol. 120, Iss. 8, (Mar 5, 2007): page 87. on their website at SOME PRETTY POWERFUL MUSIC. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Even the creator of the article agrees this no longe meets the standards for article creation. The sources pointed out don't go in depth regading the album. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.