Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Grace (Edina)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Edina, Minnesota#Places of Worship. Stifle (talk) 00:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Our Lady of Grace (Edina)[edit]
- Our Lady of Grace (Edina) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence that this church meets WP:N, contested prod from a while back, not much in improvements since Delete Secret account 15:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the newly created section Edina, Minnesota#Places of Worship. No evidence that this church is notable, e.g. for architecture, history, controversial events. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Good info perhaps better suited to church's own site. ReverendG (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. —Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't mentioned in Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis#Significant Parishes, and as mentioned above, it isn't all that notable for history (being established in 1946) or for architecture. The Church of St. Patrick in Edina is more notable, being established in 1857 and being part of the original Cahill Settlement, but I'm not sure that even merits its own article. I think a few sentences about Our Lady of Grace in the Edina, Minnesota#Places of Worship article should be enough to cover this parish, so I'll go with a redirect as mentioned above. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.