Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ouch Adenzai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch Adenzai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks notability and is unsourced. It violates every tenet of BLP. Lfstevens (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not at all a notable person. The article appears to have been created by someone who thinks that Wikipedia is something like LinkedIn. It isn't.Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely no assertion or evidence of biographical notability. No reason why this shouldn't be a CSD A7? AllyD (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep restored place article: I now see from the article history that this article has been repurposed from an article about a place to an article about a non-notable individual. This (repeated) repurposing has been User:Shivapandey444's only contribution to Wikipedia. I have restored the pre-vandalism version, which despite its faults, passes as a populated place. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Now it's been reverted. All settlements are generally regarded as being notable. Should be renamed Ouch, Pakistan, however, as its name simply appears to be Ouch. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep restored settlement article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per AllyD. Thank you for delving deeper. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.