Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otuho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Nomination Withdrawn as the article has already been renamed to Otuho language and expandned. . --Ezeu 04:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Otuho[edit]

Unencyclopedic language stub. What is known is listed in related article Lotuko --Abel 22:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect To Lotuko along with Lotuko mythology Yes, horribly written (single sentence) and lacking references but sufficiently informative to merit the possibility of further expansion. It is a real language. I think it is worthy of inclusion as a subject and the single sentence is correct from my brief research. Spoken by ~185,000 people. --Nick Y. 22:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect I'm sorry, the article seems legitimate now and it seems a good idea to unite the two mentioned. How do I retract a deletion request? I'm new at editing here on Wikipedia but as far as I have read in articles regarding deletion, I cannot figure this out. --Abel 02:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, normally, you'd write Speedy keep, but, that doesn't apply since article has become a redirect, which you're happy with. I guess Speedy Withdraw. :-) AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, don't merge. For reasons of systematics (languages rarely coincide with ethnic groups) it is better to keep language articles separate. Even when there is almost total coincidence, the convention appears to be separation; for example Dhopadhola does not redirect to Jopadhola. --Lambiam ^Talk 06:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.