Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottomen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ottomen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability for this band. I came across this as a random article and tidied it up, then realised that I had no idea why this on-off band should be notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Their albums are all self-released and do not appear to have had any success. The article was created and largely edited by Jimmydonc1 who has no other edits; I strongly suspect he is a member of the band. Emeraude (talk) 07:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In agreement with nominators argument. The absence of sources indicates this is original research by someone with intimate knowledge of the subject, but is unable to provide any standard WP:GNG rational. Probably a vanity page. ShelbyMarion (talk) 08:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.