Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottilio Cuneo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ottilio Cuneo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable fictional character - fails WP:GNG. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 12:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 12:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 12:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 12:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 12:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Characters from the Godfather series (or something). There are apparently a lot of these Godfather character articles that will need to be merged at some time due to being NN. Preserve rather than delete (for now). This will be the inaugural character for the list. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Does not receive significant coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Changed from vote above. See my comments in other Godfather AfD on same issue. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A handful of the Godfather characters are notable but this isn't one of them. Betty Logan (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.