Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otley Run (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otley Run[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on non-notable pub crawl consisting almost entirely of original research, with the sourcing comprised of blogs such as this and promotional websites. Interestingly this article in the Telegraph, listed as a source, focuses on the pubs of Otley yet it does not mention the "Otley Run." Article was nominated for deletion 11 years ago resulting in no consensus. No discernible improvement in sourcing and article weaknesses since then. Coretheapple (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

- The Otley run is the best known pub crawl in England. It is undertaken in a specified order (which should be reinstated to the article) by thousands of people from across the Yorkshire region and further abroad each weekend. Hundreds of thousands across each year.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick google search establishes that the subject is notable and that reliable sources are available. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.