Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis Alexander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otis Alexander[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Adam9007 (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-does not appear to meet any notability criteria. reddogsix (talk)\
Delete image is a copyright issue. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subscribing to all the minor Who's Who variants (whose market is entirely the vanity of those in them) strikes me as a red flag for the motivation behind this article - David Gerard (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just not finding much notability. There are some publications, but they're all out of print. No reviews of any of them. There's a video of him (maybe) playing Chopin at an amateur level. Looking in Google, he shows up in voter records and there's a report of an arrest (no conviction). He's Director of Library Science for the International University for Graduate Studies. That would qualify him as an academic, except that the Chronicle of Higher Education says the place is a diploma mill.[1] Also, they don't have a library; students get a subscription to Questia. [2] John Nagle (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Invesitgating some of the sources didn't offer any indications of notability. The African American National Biography is misrepresented as "his" publication. • DP • ^{huh?} 16:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.