Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other Goddess Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 03:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other Goddess Circle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient independent, secondary sources to establish notability under WP:NORG Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 20:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - No need delete it. There is Expert opinion of the Expert Council of the Ministry of Justice for the Altai Republic, the very independent government source. From articles on new religious movements or, for example, living people, one should not require references to dictionaries, etc. Another genre. And the subject is actual for Wikipedia. DayakSibiriak (talk) 03:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC) — DayakSibiriak (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Fails WP:NORG. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - With Goddess Circle. Not enough original, English language sources to justify its own page, and most of the content there is original research or unsourced.Bangabandhu (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - three editors have made comments - under no circumstance should an afd of this type be closed with so few comments - a case of where even more time has to be allowed for comment - inadequate depth of comment it is not a SNOW and thus should be kept open until further comments arrive JarrahTree 00:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NORG. The only source not connected with the subject is a primary document.Curdle (talk) 14:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.