Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Otelo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Practically no WP:SECONDARY sources to be found anywhere, bar the occasional passing mention in British government documents (example). Doesn't seem to have existed for some time, but no further information is available. 〜 Festucalex • talk 18:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 18:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unsourced for over a decade about a now-restructured minor governmental agency. The primary topic for the name would probably be as a Spanish-language spelling of Othello - a redirect to a section of Ofcom would not be appropriate. Walt Yoder (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Walt Yoder: I'd move Otelo (disambiguation) to Otelo, except if we consider Otelo Saraiva de Carvalho to be the primary topic, since he gets more views than any other Otelo by a degree of magnitude. 〜 Festucalex • talk 14:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable enough, with no real significant changes made to the article since its creation almost 20 years ago. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 20:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.