Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oshodhara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oshodhara[edit]
- Oshodhara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Article does not cite any references.
- Little context given.
- Contains what appears to be promotional material and links.
- Opinionated (see progress section). ←Spidern→ 08:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. -- ←Spidern→ 00:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Irretrievably unencyclopedic. Even if the group were shown to be notable, the article would have to be written again from scratch, there is nothing here that is usable. SpinningSpark 01:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I more or less agree with Spinningspark's assessment that the article's present state is hopeless towards keeping, although there is hint notability considering the extent of network of their centers. Unable to fulfill WP:ORG though. Salvageable content could be added to Osho under Legacy. LeaveSleaves 18:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.