Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osborne Training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne Training[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable training company that does not meet the General Notability Guideline. Sources located through a WP:BEFORE search were all PR, "Advertorial" or passing mentions. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage can be found. SL93 (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article is sourced to advertising listings and press releases and I am finding nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.