Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osbolewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Osbolewski[edit]

This was prodded as an unverifiable neologism but deprodded without comment or improvement. I think this is a hoax. The term seems unlikely, the explanation seems silly, and the term gets two Google hits, which are completely unrelated. Delete NickelShoe 04:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possibly Speedy delete for A1. Mike _{(T C)} 04:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, as probable personal attack at worst, neologism at best. Kuru ^talk 04:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, as an attack. Grandmasterka 06:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, slang or otherwise. CrypticBacon 07:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - As attack page, per Grandmasterka --light darkness^(talk) 11:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per Kuru. Dragoonmac - ^{If there was a problem yo I'll solve it} 16:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.