Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osadolor Nate Asemota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite !voting multiple times, those advocating to keep this have not demonstrated that the subject meets any of our guidelines for notability. Vanamonde (Talk) 07:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Osadolor Nate Asemota[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable person. The draft has twice been declined for that reason, but the article creator thinks otherwise and has again moved it to mainspace. COI has been denied here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I would like to thank User:Justlettersandnumbers for avoiding a move-war by not draftifying this page again and instead taking it to AFD.
Comment - This draft reads as if it was written with a conflict of interest. Since the author says that there is no conflict of interest, the good-faith assumption is just that it is non-neutral writing about a marginally notable person. Therefore:
Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was return to mainspace because the initial issue which is copyright was Resolved under the Wikipedia Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License and GNU Free Documentation License. and lifted from the page, meanwhile possible measure is taking by modification and improving the page hence I seek that the page should not be deleted instead needs help on effecting the possible changes to qualify it.Amosflash (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The subject would appear to be more commonly known as "Dr Dolor":

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Phil Bridger (talk) 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I agree with Phil Bridger, the birthname was used to create the page as Osadolor Nate Asemota, instead of Dr dolor that is more commonly known, but though I was thinking a redirect from the latter would help. I seek the article to be kept as the subject is notable, there is an biography of a living person that is link to the "Dr dolor" which Is also a notable person Teni (entertainer), this is enough evidence that the subject does not belong to non notable person as proposed by Justlettersandnumbers, I feel improving on the page should be considered instead of deletion.Amosflash (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I had also searched and there are reliable sources i found on the subject notability and going through the editing history, its obvious that the author is improving on the page thereby effecting the proposed conflict of interest, I feel keeping the page is the best for the case. Thank you!Jacwizy (talk) 14:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacwizy, Amosflash, could you please clarify whether there is some connection between you? I notice that both when Amosflash created this page and when Jacwizy created Ada Ehi, the other showed up within an hour or so; at Dorcas Shola-Fapson the interval was more than 24 hours. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You also both edited Shuga (season 3): Shuga Naija within a few minutes of each other. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't have any physical or virtual connection, it might be either coincidental or might have some pages on watchlist, either of the latter I have no idea, and I've seen an admin edit my several created pages simultaneously.Amosflash (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ i have edited the article, as it is now, proper sources have been made, with the writing skill to avoid conflict of interest thereby effecting the proposed changes.Amosflash (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

struck duplicate vote. Nightfury 12:29, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rv close by myself, as asked by Justlettersandnumbers - Overlooked dupe vote. As an aside if an editor does also have a concern about another voter, they need to say so otherwise this may be overlooked by an uninvolved closer. Thanking you
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 12:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks are due to Nightfury for reopening this. I'm having serious doubts regarding the sources provided, which I suspect in no way qualify as reliable or particularly in-depth or even independent as required by the most basic requirements of WP:ANYBIO: they appear to be almost exclusively blogs and social media outlets. I'm sure Bishonen would agree it's times like this we more than ever miss Oluwa2Chainz... ——SerialNumber54129 12:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although the author obviously makes all efforts to improve the article, which should be applauded, effort alone does unfortunately not qualify an article for the English Wikipedia. I can't give a fully confident vote, as I know little about the quality / category of Nigerian newspapers / websites, but my initial search any any following search hasn't turned up any results (including for "Dr. Dolor"). Sources are mostly blog entries, as already mentioned, and seem to have been written very close to the subject. And even if they, or some of them, were verifyable and reliable, they all seem to not establish notability in either case. --Ruhri Jörg 13:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ based on your my initial search there is reliable sources revealing the subject for establishing a platform that aids Teni (entertainer) which Is also a notable person, thats a clear proof, and on alleging that the blog was seems very close to the subject, I will tell you that this newspapers organization works with professional writer that understand the element of misinformation or writing in self interest as ill to the society, I believe their reports meet the standard of the organization as verifiable entity.Ruhri Jörg your contribution is welcome as we all are working hard to make Wikipedia better, I also suggest that you have little or not knowledgeable in the subject being discussed.Amosflash (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Amosflash: That is the third time you have !voted. You only have one; please don't do that again. ——SerialNumber54129 15:29, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG, its obvious that the subject is better know as Dr Dolor and has few reliable sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaizenify (talk • contribs)

Delete. The subject hasn't done enough to warrant stand-alone inclusion. The references in the article or online do not show his career being discussed extensively. As a matter of fact, the subject has only released two or three non-notable singles. Being affliated with a notable artist doesn't make one notable. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 16:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject fails WP:BASIC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.