Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Original Vampires (The Vampire Diaries)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Original Vampires (The Vampire Diaries)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Original Vampires (The Vampire Diaries) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article on a non-notable fictional concept, which is comprised almost entirely of in-universe plot summaries sourced to episode recaps, many of which are not even reliable sources. The only exception to this is the few sentences at the end about the show's development, which itself is already covered at The Originals (TV series)#Production. The actual characters listed here are already covered in a much more succinct format at List of The Originals characters, making this article redundant as a character list. As the concept of the "original vampires" from this franchise is not independently notable from the show itself, this article is an unnecessary spinout, and a general overview of the concept is already adequately described as part of the main article on The Originals (TV series). Rorshacma (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as fancruft. Through the mirror of my mind... XOR'easter (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The creator forgot to add any references, and so per WP:V we should forget this article existed. Failure of WP:GNG is an additional problem, and hardly a minor one. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with the above comments. However, Henrik, Mikael, Dahlia, and Esther's information NEEDS to be posted somewhere else. Magik 3099 (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.