Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origin of airport IATA codes-A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of airport IATA codes-A[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like a handbook and un-encyclopaedic.-- Action Hero Shoot! 15:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced, useless WP:LISTCRUFT, most codes don't have a discernable alphabetic "origin", because all the letters in the name were taken already... Kraxler (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is simply unnecessary and unlikely of improvement (a little too complex title to likely be searchable unless for a familiar viewer). SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete listcruft, as per above. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic and in nearly all cases unlikely to be sourced. MilborneOne (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.