Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OriginOil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Half spam, half copyvio. —fetch·comms 01:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OriginOil[edit]
- OriginOil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. The creator added a coatrack essay about depleting oil supplies, then added "impartial references" supporting the facts laid out in the essay, but neither the essay nor the references mention OriginOil. As far as references go, all I could find were press releases and trivial mentions. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's a strong taint of WP:SOAP about this article and, as it stands, the subject company fails WP:CORP. Eddie.willers (talk) 22:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A Google search revealed that a major part of the article has been lifted from the company website. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.