Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oriaku Kelechukwu James

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting someone’s work that took a lot of hours to create. Sadistic person Manetta4 (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was no actual reason why the article was deleted. I’m seeking a redress and an undeletion Manetta4 (talk) 09:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oriaku Kelechukwu James[edit]

Oriaku Kelechukwu James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient starring roles to pass WP:NACTOR's criteria. AmusingWeasel (talk) 13:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. He is still an up-and-coming actor who doesn't have a movie career to speak of. Starring in one film that is borderline notable isn't enough to warrant a stand-alone article.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 23:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Lol. It’s giving sadistic hater. Seek help bro Manetta4 (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — the sources itself gives me the A7 vibe. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 04:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.