Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordem Paranormal: Enigma do Medo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Draft:Ordem Paranormal: Enigma do Medo, per WP:PRESERVE. BD2412 T 03:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ordem Paranormal: Enigma do Medo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and likely a WP:GNG/WP:NVG failure. Zero hits in WP:VG/SE; the sources listed are either primary (#2) or unreliable. IceWelder [✉] 08:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 08:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely TOOSOON. Page can be recreated when there's more coverage of this by publications, otherwise it fails WP:GNG. Namcokid 47 14:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify (which I think could have been done at the NPP stage): potential merit as an upcoming topic, with usable primary sources (even though such sources don't contribute to notability). Delete as a second choice preferable to keep. — Bilorv (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.