Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange juice cd trick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orange juice cd trick[edit]

This is possibly original research, and as such, Wikipedia is not an advice guide. SunStar Net 22:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Some hybrid of WP:NOR WP:HOAX, maybe a bit of WP:NONSENSE for good measure. Creator proudly states that all his edits get reverted, and he's been banned once before for Colbert-elephant vandalism, so I'm having trouble coming up with WP:FAITH that this page should be kept except in the case of substantial WP:RS citation. Added later: having read further, the content is a load of factual errors, weasel-words to avoid having to support anything as being actually "correct", etc etc. DMacks 00:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete No words come to mind except "garbage." -- Kicking222 13:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, obvious hoax that might cause some poor user to wreck their computer. I wouldn't be opposed to a speedy delete g3 as pure vandalism. NawlinWiki 15:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom, WP:BOLLOCKS. Just instructions on how to ruin your CD drive by getting OJ in the gears. I think a speedy G1 or G3 is called for, too. Tubezone 15:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.