Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opus Oils

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opus Oils[edit]

Promotional information for a non-notable company. Twenty-three unique google hits. Prod tag was removed without comment. ScottW 02:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Reads like spam, i.e. "Clients often comment on how potent and long lasting their products are…" Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, adspam Deizio 02:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from [1]. Deizio 02:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was going to suggest {{advert}}, myself. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the author has tried to blank his own article, [2] should we take that as db-author? Kimchi.sg 04:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - defo delete per nom. Wickethewok 04:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sorry Guy 05:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE I wrote the article because I thought these guys were cool. It's all true and can be backed up. Contact the company. I sincerely apologise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollywoodtrim (talk • contribs)
- Response - No harm, no foul. Enjoy your future editing! Wickethewok 07:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 09:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 14:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.