Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optic Nerve Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Optic Nerve Film[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy corporate notability. No independent references provided (maybe because there aren't any). Google search does not find in-depth coverage (only the usual vanity hits). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I could not find coverage in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. gongshow talk 06:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. After some Googling I cannot even find any evidence of its existence beyond a LinkedIn profile for Still and its own website and YouTube channel.--A bit iffy (talk) 07:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.