Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opiate for the Masses

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Opiate for the Masses[edit]

Opiate for the Masses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches simply found nothing good at all with this being the best I found and even some of the articles for the band members seem questionably notable and keepable so I would like some insight with this and this simply has not improved since starting in February 2006. Pinging Onel5969, Skyerise and (aeropagitica). SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There were a few brief mentions on News and Highbeam, mostly announcements of the band being part of some function. The best I found was this. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, also fails WP:NBAND. Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's no real coverage of this band and fails WP:GNG. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:GNG (aeropagitica) 19:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have not formed a view yet, but there is a short biography at [1], a mention of the band's name in this book [2] and a review here [3]. I will see what else I can turn up that is reliable.--SabreBD (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.