Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Think Pink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Operation Think Pink[edit]
- Operation Think Pink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable nonprofit group; Google News searching produces nothing to support its inclusion here. A PROD tag was removed, so it is being brought here. Does not meet WP:ORG or WP:RS. Warrah (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No secondary/independent sources cited. No Google coverage except internal stuff. Not rated by Charity Navigator. --MelanieN (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
- Don't Delete: "Hungry for Change - Bringing educational opportunities to Iraqi women", Ryan T. Blystone, USD Magazine (http://www.sandiego.edu/usdmag/?p=663). I think it's a reference and it's more than several newborn (and also old) organizations have online. OTP was a delegate at the Joan Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice (http://www.sandiego.edu/peacestudies/ipj/) for Crafting Human Security in an Insecure World in September 2008. Giacinto W(talk) 22:41, 29 November 2009 (GMT+1)
- Delete without prejudice. When it's notable enough, recreate. All I can find (after removing 'cancer' and 'Robert & Kristen' - whoever they may be - from the search) is Facebook, linkedn and other such that don't count as reliable. And the San Diego magazine, which I regard as somewhat promotional - but a step in the right direction. The organisation sounds worthwhile, but we aren't getting or finding evidence of this. I'm prepared to change my mind if presented with a bit more. By the way, OTP can't BE a delegate, unless it consists of only one person. It can send a delegate. Peridon (talk) 21:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.