Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opera South (United States)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Opera South (United States)[edit]
- Opera South (United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article about two separate companies that needs to be split. However I don't think either company is notable. Marcus Qwertyus 20:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pointless article glomming together two unrelated things, neither notable. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and start over. This appears to be an attempt to disambiguate two performance companies by having a single article on both of them at the same time. If the individual companies are related by more than name, the article needs to say so; all signs point to that they are not, however If the individual companies are notable unto themselves, they should have articles, but this article should not exist as a DAB until there are >2 such pages. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - corrected a spelling error. Damn homonyms.... =^^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for all the reasons above. If either company is notable, a new article can be created with appropriate reliable sources. --Deskford (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.