Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opencube Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all three articles. Mike V • Talk 02:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opencube Labs[edit]

These articles form a walled garden of non-notable content. Please see WP:CORP and WP:BIO. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With improved grammar and third party references, these articles should be kept, otherwise, no.DThomsen8 (talk) 15:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: This page (a ref from one of the articles) makes a mere mention of Suraj Kumar Jana and Opencube Labs. Otherwise I can’t find any references in reliable sources. —teb728 t c 06:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All WP:MILL. In India you can find a lot of SSE entrepreneurs. We can't keep articles for all of them. Wikipedia has a notability criteria to have articles for people and organizations. These articles fails them. Athachil (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All As Per Magog the Ogre Fails both WP:CORP and WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Lack of reliable sources, should be deleted. --Obsidi (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.