Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open source statistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 18:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Open source statistics[edit]

Open source statistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not understand what the article is about. If it is about some particular software, than it is not notable. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – Looks like an idea for studying statistical theory while looking at the source code of open-source programs, to see how programs do it. In any case it's WP:OR. No references, no assertion of notability. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as WP:OR. Things like this exist, see R (programming language), but this article is WP:OR. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy This is a stub created on Dec. 30 by a new editor. Rather than delete it, and since we don't know where the editor was going with this, it makes sense to me to turn it back to the editor, with some encouragement to read WP:RS, and WP:NOTABILITY (and more) before continuing. I usually like to advise new editors that starting with a new article is the hardest route, and that making edits to current articles is a better way to gain experience. Also note that, depending where this editor lives, this is a holiday time, so editor may not be watching WP at the moment. LaMona (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as WP:OR. -- 120.23.38.47 (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.