Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenDD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OpenDD[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable XML format, used in a single product and no longer used. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not independently notable. Could merit a sentence in the Elgg article. DMacks (talk) 05:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software format article of unclear notability lacking significant RS coverage. A search revealed no such RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or maybe Merge with Elgg. Not notable. ––Agyle (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.