Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenCart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 22:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OpenCart[edit]

Delete no demonstration of notability and barely any context to know what this software does, and of course no references either. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep conditional on finding more sources, otherwise Weak Delete. I found a spanish source that could serve as an independent source for this article: [1] I have been unable to find any other independent sources. However, it does get a very large number (>130,000) of google hits, so I would be hesitant to jump to a delete on this one. Also, do a search for "powered by opencart": [2], over 14,000 hits. People are using this. I would prefer to keep the page but I don't think a single source + the project's homepage would be good enough to justify keeping it, and that's all I'm finding, besides internet forums. Cazort (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - the source is in Italian, not Spanish :) — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 17:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 17:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I looked at that too hastily. They look so similar superficially! Cazort (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment: I really hate to see stubs AfDed within a day of page creation. Obviously, the article is not enough in the present condition. However, I hope that potential contributors aren't spooked from improving it & I'd encourage a bit more patience before submitting non-spammy stubs for deletion. --Karnesky (talk) 23:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability indicated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.