Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open-E DSS V7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, it seems to be consensus that the subject is currently not sufficiently notable to merit an article.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Open-E DSS V7[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see evidence for notability. The first reference is apparently a brief press release. The second , though longer, says right at the top that it's a press release. The others are from the company web site, or press releases from products it interfaces with. I recognizer the difficulty of finding sources in this area, andI usually will accept one substantial independent review, but we don;t have even that.

This was accepted at AfC ; I doubt it would have been at NPP. DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only claim to notability I can find here is a "Product of the Month" award from SearchStorage.de [1], which does not appear to be a particularly notable award. Company materials and press release info alone is not independent of the subject, and so there is a lack of significant coverage from such reviews. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 20:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.