Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opal Koboi (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Artemis Fowl characters. Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opal Koboi[edit]

Opal Koboi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears well referenced, but it seems that all that is referenced is the plot summary. There is no reception, analysis, nothing to suggested the character is notable. BEFORE finds only plot summaries and some comments about the book Artemis Fowl and the Opal Deception of which she is the protagonist. Per WP:ATD, I can suggested at best to soft delete this by redirecting this to List of Artemis Fowl characters. And if anyone cares, I think pretty much all fictional elements in Template:Artemis Fowl have major issues with GNG and, well, guess what we will probably be seeing in Fiction delsort over the next few months... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirectto one of the book articles, I'm not seeing much about the characters outside of discussions of the books. Oaktree b (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Artemis Fowl Feetfeet 341 (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to the list of characters. There is a consensus that character lists can create combined notability in addition to the book itself. Archrogue (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.