Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onyx Millenium Football Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as a non-notable football club that apparently cannot even spell its own name correctly - Millennium, ibid. (aeropagitica) 21:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Onyx Millenium Football Club[edit]
- Onyx Millenium Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
No reply to queries on Talk:Onyx Millenium Football Club or my note to Celtic0106. Presuming non-notable. -- Smjg 23:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence indicating this team even exists (violates WP:V). Even if it does exist, it's probably an absolutely non-notable backyard league. --Kinu t/c 01:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)*[reply]
- Delete - as per Kinu - fchd 06:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no Ghits even vaguely related to sports teams (one interesting one to do with sex toys though!), non-specific details such as the fact that they play in "an amateur league", and a logo apparently drawn by a 6-year old in MS Paint point to it being a hoax. Oh, and as the article states that they play football, which is a disambig page, we don't really even know what sport they supposedly play..... ChrisTheDude 08:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- ....and of course the article creator can't even get his or her facts straight, as the article claims they have won the league 11 times but only lists 6 1st place finishes in the chronology..... ChrisTheDude 13:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 14:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V, WP:CORP and ChrisTheDude's comments. Qwghlm 14:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like rubbish to me. aLii 18:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly non-notable.--R613vlu 13:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.