Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Malleable Iron Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Malleable Iron Company[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation, per WP:CORP and WP:ORGSIG. Online reference is fleeting and simply an example of the industry of Oshawa, not as significant in its own right. LS1979 (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article is a direct feed from Knob Hill Farms. As facility in which Knob Hill Oshawa moved into, it has historical significance. Further, this site, in addition to others was a reason why Oshawa was at one time considered the "Manchester of Canada". Again, significant historical significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMTEgirl (talk • contribs) 22:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article isn't even a day old and is undergoing rapid development. Already appears to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I can see why the nominator made this proposal. The only significant article I could find was this one. Still, the scattering of small mentions about this company seems to indicate that it was at one time an important company, which employed a lot of people, and shaped the economic growth of Oshawa. With a lot of digging a decent article might be constructed. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.