Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only a Fool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sam Walton (talk) 23:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only a Fool[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable references in this page. Song is not notable and singer is not notable too. -TheSawTooth (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the article satisfies WP:NSONGS. The charts table on the article says that the song has been on the Norwegian Singles Chart, the Norwegian Radio Chart, the Luxembourg Singles Chart, and the Swedish Singles Chart. #1 on WP:NSONGS is "Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts", so the article satisfies that by being on 4 of the charts. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 05:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Marit Larsen. While I find the prods of her albums ill-judged, and the deletion nom of the artist as inexplicable, these articles on the singles have little sourced content other than the chart information, so could be merged to the Marit Larsen article. --Michig (talk) 06:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 00:09, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Top 10 on national charts suggests notability, and I know Stylus Magazine in particular covered it some ([1][2][3]). No strong objections to merging into Under the Surface. hinnk (talk) 04:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.