Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Skin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ys (album). (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 00:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only Skin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song fails WP:NSONG. Wholly-unsourced quote is too long and too insignificant to merge with Ys (album) or with artist's article. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ys (album) per notability criteria for songs. This song may be not notable, but it is a valid search term. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ys (album), as per WP:NSONGS, which states that: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." If the redirect is reverted, an admin can always protect the page.--hkr Laozi speak 17:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to redirect, as nominator. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 03:25, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.