Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ongville Commercial Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ongville Commercial Complex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unremarkable, common shopping mall, no claim to notability, fails WP:N and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While malls are sometimes considered notable if they are prominent or are of significance to the community it serves, this one doesn't seem to be the case (note that I visited Lucban a few months ago and I don't recall encountering the mall that is the subject of the article.) Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in addition to Narutolvehinata5 reasons, I think it is significant to point out that the article itself doesn't even try to establish notability beyond the fact that it is a location that exists. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.