Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Sure Insurance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One Sure Insurance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an advertisement, fails WP:ORG and WP:ORGDEPTH JMHamo (talk) 10:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as the best results I found were this (one of the links currently listed and the other PR saying they're one of the fastest growing companies in the country). WP:TNT and start when better. SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now as the company is clearly large enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. There are tons of media sources out there citing One Sure Insurance if you look far enough. Example 1 Example 2 Example 3. I have seen far less notable Wiki entries. Although I think the One Sure page could be added with notable community feats they have achieved - such as supporting major causes such as the Spitfire. Icematikx (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - As Icematikx is the creator of the article with a clear COI, I would expect you !vote to keep. JMHamo (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Clearly, this vote seems personal as you disagreed with an edit I made on Wolverhampton Wanderers, and went after an article I made from there. One Sure Insurance is a notable company whichever way you look at it - with 90+ employees, and growing to 200, with major award nominations. I can think of far less notable companies who have Wikispace. Icematikx (talk) 11:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument.Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources provided that cover the company itself in depth - agree that it fails WP:ORG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.