Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Percent Full

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One Percent Full[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source is an IMDB entry, and IMDB not considered reliable. Notability of film not established. McDoob AU93 14:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable film with unreliable references. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 16:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for lacking the coverage to meet WP:NF. As it exists, it might be mentioned in articles on Burton Richardson, Ronnie Ricketts, Andrea del Rosario and Niño Muhlach, but is simply fails notability criteria for a separate article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage in reliable sources found; appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NF. Gongshow talk 22:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.